data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb6f7/cb6f712b52c1f7d4f850406ff0bb1e6bb62d1fa5" alt=""
I thought that the books was good and it was exciting. There were lots of twists and turns, and it was a thrill of a book. It had lots of great elements to a story including: romance, mystery, scare, thrill, shock, intensity, fun, and it was easy to relate to most of the time. It had a lot of good qualities. The only thing I didn't really like is that some things... well, some was predictable. The others were that the end was awful, in my personal opinion, I think it was a really cruddy setup for a sequel. Which exhists, but it was one of those books that was great, but no- I don't want to read another. The characters were interesting but I didn't like the way things were laid out sometimes, and I also thought that at times the could make things tedious OCCASIONALLY with some unneccesary long descriptions, and then I felt when it mattered, I needed a better picture -a better description.
All in all, I thought it was a good book, and I think most kids/teens (whatever) and 12&up could easily enjoy this book. 4 stars!
1 comment:
Hi! Cat again.
I just read the sequel "Behind the Curtain" (An Echo Falls Mystery) -Peter Abrahams
It was also good. It portrayed the same characters. It still carried the same amount of thrill, maybe a bit more, the kind that made you want to keep reading. It was published in 2006 or 7, and there was supposed to be a third, but now, being 2010 I kinda wonder whether that is to happen or not.
My have a few problems with this one though.
The predicatability. Oh geez! Maybe it's just me, but I kind of predicted most of it. A lot of it actually.
Then, the character; THE MAIN ONE. Ingrid. INGRIDINGRIDINGRID. By the end of the book especially, her attitude, or really, the clueless, thinksshessoclever, troublemaking/finding, problem 'solving?' things that go through her head, thinking she can fix it all... That got VERY ANNOYING. And I just don't think anyone is really that dumb/complicated (at the same time.) It's just really. Bizzarre. And I think maybe it was just kind of her ideology. I do think it was exaggerated. No person really thinks like that I don't think..
Hey, that could be just me though, so, keep reading, ya bookworms. :):)
Post a Comment